Case Study

Tech founders: Here are five pitfalls you should avoid in a pivotal situation

100 days ago, I announced my newest venture, Pivotal AG.

Since then, Iโ€™ve had almost 100 initial calls with tech founders in critical situations.
Here are five pitfalls I spotted over and over:

๐Ÿญ. ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ผ ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†
If youโ€™re not seeing substantial growth AND your runwayโ€™s under 12 months, itโ€™s an absolute red flag (!)

Do not wait for the situation to get worse.
โ†’ Address the potential emergency within your management team and board.
Hit the brakes on costs. Shift to โ€œexplorationโ€ mode with small, non-expensive experiments to find a new direction.

๐Ÿฎ. ๐—™๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ป
8 out of 10 founders I talk to feel isolated with their strategic challenges:
Thereโ€™s no or very limited support from the board. No advisors involved, and sometimes even no shared feeling of responsibility within the management team.

I see you. But hereโ€™s the thing.
โ†’ Your board members carry ultimate responsibility. Push them to get involved.
Donโ€™t ask for a favor, demand action. Bring in people from outside to get a fresh, unbiased view into your situation.

๐Ÿฏ. ๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด
If youโ€™re not growing and still burning cash, itโ€™s a pretty good indicator that you are on the wrong track. Simple as that.

โ†’ Yes, cutting costs is hard.
But itโ€™s THE best move you can make to give yourself another shot at success.

๐Ÿฐ. ๐—ฃ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ป โ€œ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—นโ€
Founders often tell me: โ€œeverything depends on this one dealโ€
Or: โ€œif this investor invests in our company, we can turn the situation around.”

โ†’ This is a dangerous mindset to live by.
A business that relies on the decision of one customer or one investor is not sustainable enough. To depend on one is to have ALL the others not buying in.
(read that again)
Reset, and plan your future as if that deal never happens. If it happens then nevertheless, all the better.

๐Ÿฑ. ๐—›๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ โ€œ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒโ€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ-๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜„๐˜๐—ต
Customers might tell you, “If only you had this feature, Iโ€™d buy more”. But donโ€™t take that as solid advice, especially when those โ€œmust haveโ€ features are not the same for every customer.

โ†’ Itโ€™s almost NEVER just one feature that changes everything.
And if it were, you should be able to monetize it upfront, big.
Only deliver that feature once youโ€™ve got a signed, paid agreement from a group of customers to implement it, and if you are sure it really improves your financial situation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *